Copyright lawyer Ray Dowd points out that Boston College is
telling students that simply
using a wireless router is a sign of copyright infringement. Take a look at the image below:
The page lists out a variety of other things that are a lot more likely (but not definitely) to involve infringing -- such as using file sharing networks to share copyrighted songs, or emailing songs around. But using a wireless router? As Dowd discusses, the three federal court rulings involving copyright that mention wireless routers,
all use it as a defense against infringement, because it highlights how someone else may have used the connection.
So why is Boston College telling students that simply using a wireless router is a sign of infringement?
Permalink |
Comments |
Email This Story Larissa Meek Gina Carano Sanaa Lathan Ana Beatriz Barros Maria Menounos
No comments:
Post a Comment